> Do you have a reason for using fp-bit instead of soft-fp? Apart from the obvious historical reason, probably not, but recently added ports (Blackfin, Epiphany) also use it so I'm not sure we want to change it.
> libgcc files are generally GPL+exception, not LGPL without exception with > a very old FSF address (config/visium/div64.c, mod64.c, > set_trampoline_parity.c, udiv64.c, udivmod64.c, umod64.c) Files whose copyright/origin is clear are already GPL+exception, but these 6 files were originally imported from Glibc so they aren't in the same basket. I guess I can reuse the copyright notice of soft-fp for them. -- Eric Botcazou
