On 12/12/2014 05:57 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 07:51:44PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
>> I was worried about exactly the same "problem" on powerpc with r11
>> being used for the static chain and also destroyed in linkage stubs.
>> It turns out we don't traverse any linkage stubs.
>>
>> See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg00446.html.
>
> I've written a small test suite that tests reflection calls over
> module boundaries (see attachment). Build with "make" and then
> just run "./main". The program must not crash; it does not check
> consistency of the function arguments.
Oh, that's interesting. You've found a bug in the x86_64 linking:
gccgo -g3 -O3 -Wall -Werror -c -fPIC q.go -o q.o
gccgo -shared -Wl,-soname,libq.so -o libq.so q.o
gccgo -g3 -O3 -Wall -Werror -c -fPIC p.go -o p.o
gccgo -shared -Wl,-soname,libp.so -o libp.so p.o
gccgo -g3 -O3 -Wall -Werror -o main main.go libq.so libp.so
/usr/bin/ld: main: hidden symbol `__morestack' in
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.3/libgcc.a(morestack.o) is referenced by
DSO
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [main] Error 1
Sure enough, both shared libraries failed to pull __morestack
from the static libgcc.
$ nm libq.so | grep more
U __morestack
I guess __morestack is included in the wrong portion of libgcc?
Ian?
r~
