2014-12-10 21:07 GMT+03:00 James Greenhalgh <james.greenha...@arm.com>:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:13:22PM +0000, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Ilya Enkovich <enkovich....@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > 2014-12-10 19:49 GMT+03:00 Andreas Schwab <sch...@suse.de>:
>> >> Ilya Enkovich <enkovich....@gmail.com> writes:
>> >>
>> >>> 2014-12-10 18:53 GMT+03:00 Andreas Schwab <sch...@suse.de>:
>> >>>> Ilya Enkovich <enkovich....@gmail.com> writes:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> 2014-12-10 17:49 GMT+03:00 Andreas Schwab <sch...@suse.de>:
>> >>>>>> Ilya Enkovich <enkovich....@gmail.com> writes:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> * gcc.dg/lto/lto.exp: Load mpx-dg.exp.
>> >>>>>>> * gcc.dg/lto/chkp-privatize_0.c: New.
>> >>>>>>> * gcc.dg/lto/chkp-privatize_1.c: New.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> xgcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-mmpx'
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/chkp-privatize c_lto_chkp-privatize_0.o assemble,
>> >>>>>> -fPIC -flto -flto-partition=max -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> What is the target?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Pick any.
>> >>>
>> >>> Here it is.
>> >>
>> >> Try again.
>> >
>> > Same result. And see no errors for this test in gcc-regression.
>>
>> Try again.
>
> In the interests of breaking us out of this loop...
>
> At least: {arm-none-linux-gnueabihf, arm-none-eabi,
> aarch64-none-linux-gnueabi, aarch64-none-elf, aarch64_be-none-elf}
> fail for me.
Hello James,
Could you please attach a gcc.log file for one of your runs?
Thanks,
Ilya
>
> Cheers,
> James
>
