On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:10:15PM +0400, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> That would be an option too. I don't know whether it is much better or not.
> Kernel lives without constructors, they are used only by coverage. And
> coverage does not need priorities. So it is only kasan that needs
> priorities. That would be a plenty of code in lib/module.c only for
> kasan...
If you change it, we can revert the gcc change.
> Meanwhile here is backport to 4.9. Applied w/o conflicts (not counting
> ChangeLog).
>
> OK to commit to gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_9-branch ?
Ok.
Jakub
