On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Christian Bruel <christian.br...@st.com> wrote: > > > On 11/19/2014 03:18 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Christian Bruel <christian.br...@st.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I think I missed the stage3, Anyway would it be OK for stage1 when it >>> reopens ? >> >> >> Since you submitted this well during stage1 and given that these >> patches address comments from earlier in the review process we should >> aim to get these in for 5.0. If at some point during the review >> process it looks risky and there needs to be significant rework we can >> always stop. It's on the list of patches to be reviewed and I will >> find some dedicated time later this week to set down and review / play >> with the patches in an attempt to move this forward as it is a >> reasonably large chunk of work. > > > Thanks, also I forgot to mention that you need > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg01231.html > to play with the attribute. Will be part of the same shot.
Isn't that Ok'd for committing ? Why then isn't it applied ? Ramana > > Christian > > >> >> Thanks for continuing to work on these patches and addressing the >> earlier review comments. >> >> regards >> Ramana >> >>> >>> Christian >>> >
