Hello!
> I've added avx512f support to __builtin_cpu_supports.
> I'm not sure about bw+vl, i think for compound values like
> avx512bd+dq+vl, arch is better. Also for such cases prority is unclear,
> what should we choose bw+vl or e. g. avx512f+er?
> I've left MPX bits in cpuid.h, in case we will need them later (e. g.
> for runtime mpx tests enabling).
>
> Ok for trunk?
>
> gcc/
>
> * config/i386/cpuid.h (bit_MPX, bit_BNDREGS, bit_BNDCSR):
> Define.
> * config/i386/i386.c (get_builtin_code_for_version): Add avx512f.
> (fold_builtin_cpu): Ditto.
> * doc/extend.texi: Documment it.
>
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
> * g++.dg/ext/mv2.C: Add test for target ("avx512f").
> * gcc.target/i386/builtin_target.c: Ditto.
>
>
> libgcc/
>
> * config/i386/cpuinfo.c (processor_features): Add FEATURE_AVX512F.
> * config/i386/cpuinfo.c (get_available_features): Detect it.
OK.
Thanks,
Uros.
