On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Ilya Enkovich wrote: > > If it's intended only as the latter - and this is documented - then you > > don't have the libgcc-like requirements, and there's no point in having > > multiple libraries. If it's intended for both, that points the way to > > separate libraries (where the debugging-tool library would be used in that > > use case, but the crash-reporter-interception case would expect programs > > to have been linked with only the minimal library). > > Would it be enough to mention implicit link and resulting pthread > dependency in -fcheck-pointer-bounds description in invoke.texi?
Well, that and say explicitly that it's intended as a debugging tool rather than for general hardening. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
