On 12 November 2014 17:47, Charles Baylis <charles.bay...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 12 November 2014 15:35, Alan Lawrence <alan.lawre...@arm.com> wrote: >> Nice! One nit - can the extra "tree" argument be a "const_tree" ? - I'll >> defer to the maintainers on the use of C++ default arguments in the AArch64 >> backend. But LGTM. > > Thanks, good catch. > > The default parameter will go away once all of the calls in the > machine description are removed. > > I've respun the patch with const_tree.
What is the plan for getting rid of the default arguments? Cheers /Marcus
