On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:31:24PM +0000, James Greenhalgh wrote: > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 09:50:52PM +0000, Marc Glisse wrote: > > Thanks. Do you know if anyone is planning to "port" this patch to the arm > > target (which IIRC has the same issue)? No pressure, this is just so I > > know if I should ping the alternate __float128 patch or wait. > > Yes, you're right, the arm target also has this issue. I have a port of > Tejas' patch based on top of some other refactoring of the arm > target's builtin infrastructure I've been working on - I'm hoping to get > that all rebased and proposed upstream in the next couple of weeks.
This is all done now (r217700), so your patch should be safe to go in. Thanks James
