+gcc-patches
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Konstantin Serebryany <konstantin.s.serebry...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am opposed to this change. > Upstream code builds with -std=c++11. > Building this code here with another set of options is a time bomb. > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:23 AM, <u...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >> Author: uros >> Date: Fri Nov 14 14:23:51 2014 >> New Revision: 217562 >> >> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217562&root=gcc&view=rev >> Log: >> * sanitizer_common/Makefile.am (AM_CXXFLAGS): Use -std=gnu++11. >> * asan/Makefile.am (AM_CXXFLAGS): Ditto. >> * lsan/Makefile.am (AM_CXXFLAGS): Ditto. >> * interception/Makefile.am (AM_CXXFLAGS): Ditto. >> * tsan/Makefile.am (AM_CXXFLAGS): Ditto. >> * libbacktrace/Makefile.am (AM_CXXFLAGS): Ditto. >> * ubsan/Makefile.am (AM_CXXFLAGS): Ditto. >> * sanitizer_common/Makefile.in: Regenerate. >> * asan/Makefile.in: Ditto. >> * lsan/Makefile.in: Ditto. >> * interception/Makefile.in: Ditto. >> * tsan/Makefile.in: Ditto. >> * libbacktrace/Makefile.in: Ditto. >> * ubsan/Makefile.in: Ditto. >> >> >> Modified: >> trunk/libsanitizer/ChangeLog >> trunk/libsanitizer/asan/Makefile.am >> trunk/libsanitizer/asan/Makefile.in >> trunk/libsanitizer/interception/Makefile.am >> trunk/libsanitizer/interception/Makefile.in >> trunk/libsanitizer/libbacktrace/Makefile.am >> trunk/libsanitizer/libbacktrace/Makefile.in >> trunk/libsanitizer/lsan/Makefile.am >> trunk/libsanitizer/lsan/Makefile.in >> trunk/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/Makefile.am >> trunk/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/Makefile.in >> trunk/libsanitizer/tsan/Makefile.am >> trunk/libsanitizer/tsan/Makefile.in >> trunk/libsanitizer/ubsan/Makefile.am >> trunk/libsanitizer/ubsan/Makefile.in >>
