On Nov 12, 2014, at 7:04 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopeziba...@gmail.com> wrote: > And I think GCC is wrong to wan here. The point of the Wempty-body > warning is to catch things like: > > if(a); > return 2; > return 3; > > However, > > if(a) > ; > return 2;
In the olden days, we didn’t have enough information to do the warnings well. clang did better, cause it always had the information necessary. I think if (); should warn, and if () ; should not, neither should if () \n ;, if we have the information.
