PR52769 reports a bug that has been fixed in 4.7, but the test case
was never added. So I'd like to put this test in and close PR52769.
Ok?
2014-10-29 Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com>
PR c/52769
* gcc.dg/pr52769.c: New test.
diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr52769.c gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr52769.c
index e69de29..138cecb 100644
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr52769.c
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr52769.c
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+/* PR c/52769 */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3" } */
+
+typedef struct
+{
+ int should_be_zero;
+ char s[6];
+ int x;
+} foo_t;
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ volatile foo_t foo = {
+ .s = "123456",
+ .x = 2
+ };
+
+ if (foo.should_be_zero != 0)
+ __builtin_abort ();
+
+ return 0;
+}
Marek
