On October 24, 2014 6:47:10 PM CEST, Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter.nils...@axis.com> wrote: >> From: Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> >> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:56:51 +0200 >> On Fri, 24 Oct 2014, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: >> > Still, I don't understand exactly how your patch >> > introduces build-subdirectories where there were none before. >> > Maybe that "+all-gcc: maybe-all-build-libcpp" was wrong and >> > should be different? >> >> No, we do need a build-libcpp to build gcc/build/genmatch. >> Not sure how you got around without a build-libiberty as other >> gen* programs surely require that. > >Regular cross-configurations got around fine as they used the >"host"-build libiberty, which for crosses seemed to differ from >"build"-builds(!) only in that they're built at the objdir top >instead of objdir/build-<hosttuple>. Crosses *could* still use >the host libraries, but whatever; we're avoiding a >cross-or-native-conditional now. I haven't given >canadian-crosses any thought, maybe they were broken before.
Most definitely. I wonder why we don't use the same trick with regular bootstrap. There I see build- variants of libiberty used for stage1. Richard. >brgds, H-P
