On 10/23/2014 11:38 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:35:44AM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
The testcase is clearly i?86/x86_64 specific, so it must be guarded with
{ target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* }, and as it is a compile time test, no need

Right, that's what my patch already does.

for assembler support, so just adding -msse2 option to dg-option is the
right thing to do.

Ok, will try that.  Still no idea why Linux/x86 and Solaris/x86 are
different here.

Why do you think so?  I certainly have:
FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-21.c (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-21.c scan-ipa-dump icf "Equal symbols: 1"
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-21.c scan-ipa-dump icf "Semantic equality 
hit:bar->foo"
in my i686-linux test_summary log.  It really depends on how the compiler
is configured, if it defaults to march that has sse/sse2 by default, it will
succeed, otherwise it will not.

        Jakub


Hello.

I combined both patches and run regression tests on x86_64-linux-pc.
Ready for trunk?

Thanks,
Martin
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-21.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-21.c
index 7358e43..68aabc5 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-21.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-21.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-ipa-icf"  } */
+/* { dg-do compile { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -msse2 -fdump-ipa-icf"  } */
 
 #include <xmmintrin.h>
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-28.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-28.c
index 538e0ab..bcaf84e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-28.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-28.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-do compile { target init_priority } } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-ipa-icf-details -fno-inline"  } */
 
 __attribute__ ((noinline, constructor(200)))

Reply via email to