On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 03:34:38PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > >--- a/gcc/cse.c > >+++ b/gcc/cse.c > >@@ -6953,6 +6953,11 @@ delete_trivially_dead_insns (rtx_insn *insns, int > >nreg) > > /* If no debug insns can be present, COUNTS is just an array > > which counts how many times each pseudo is used. */ > > } > >+ /* Pseudo PIC register should be considered as used due to possible > >+ new usages generated. */ > >+ if (pic_offset_table_rtx > >+ && REGNO (pic_offset_table_rtx) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER) > >+ counts[REGNO (pic_offset_table_rtx)]++; > > /* Go from the last insn to the first and delete insns that only set > > unused > > registers or copy a register to itself. As we delete an insn, remove > > usage counts for registers it uses. > Shouldn't this also be guarded with !reload_completed? One reload is > complete all the implicit references to the PIC register should be explicit > and thus there's no need to treat the PIC register special.
Supposedly this one yes. > >diff --git a/gcc/dce.c b/gcc/dce.c > >index 5b7d36e..a52a59c 100644 > >--- a/gcc/dce.c > >+++ b/gcc/dce.c > >@@ -127,6 +127,10 @@ deletable_insn_p (rtx_insn *insn, bool fast, > >bitmap arg_stores) > > if (HARD_REGISTER_NUM_P (DF_REF_REGNO (def)) > > && global_regs[DF_REF_REGNO (def)]) > > return false; > >+ /* Initialization of pseudo PIC register should never be removed. */ > >+ else if (DF_REF_REG (def) == pic_offset_table_rtx > >+ && REGNO (pic_offset_table_rtx) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER) > >+ return false; > Similarly. But here, after reload completes, there shouldn't be pseudos in the IL, so the condition should not trigger anymore. Jakub