On 15/10/14 10:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
We might also want to consider a global s/gnu++0x/gnu++11/ some day.
One reason for doing that replacement is that I keep copying existing tests and then having to change it, and I'm lazy!
On 15/10/14 10:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
We might also want to consider a global s/gnu++0x/gnu++11/ some day.
One reason for doing that replacement is that I keep copying existing tests and then having to change it, and I'm lazy!