On 2014-10-08 10:21 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/01/14 17:27, David Malcolm wrote:
FWIW, presumably "insn" here also can now be an rtx_insn *?
(I'd like to eventually strengthen the params to the note-handling
functions, so fixing this up now would help with that).
Here's the updated patch to include strengthening insn to rtx_insn *.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
OK for the trunk? I'd like to get this wrapped up so that a patch in
the same area from Felix can get rebased and move forward.
It is ok for the trunk, Jeff. Sorry for the delay with the response.
As you know I was busy with the rematerialzation pass.
