On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Evgeny Stupachenko <evstu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i386 specific part of the patch:
>
> 2014-10-08 Ilya Enkovich <ilya.enkov...@intel.com>
> Vladimir Makarov <vmaka...@redhat.com>
> * gcc/config/i386/i386.c (ix86_use_pseudo_pic_reg): New.
> (ix86_init_pic_reg): New.
> (ix86_select_alt_pic_regnum): Add check on pseudo register.
> (ix86_save_reg): Likewise.
> (ix86_expand_prologue): Remove irrelevant code.
> (ix86_output_function_epilogue): Add check on pseudo register.
> (set_pic_reg_ever_alive): New.
> (legitimize_pic_address): Replace df_set_regs_ever_live with new
> set_pic_reg_ever_alive.
> (legitimize_tls_address): Likewise.
> (ix86_pic_register_p): New check.
> (ix86_delegitimize_address): Add check on pseudo register.
> (ix86_expand_call): Insert move from pseudo PIC register to ABI
> defined REAL_PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM.
> (TARGET_INIT_PIC_REG): New.
> (TARGET_USE_PSEUDO_PIC_REG): New.
> (PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM): New check.
Couple of nits below.
+/* Set regs_ever_live for PIC base address register
+ to true if required. */
+static void
+set_pic_reg_ever_alive ()
Please rename this function to set_pic_reg_ever_live.
-#define PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM \
- ((TARGET_64BIT && (ix86_cmodel == CM_SMALL_PIC \
- || TARGET_PECOFF)) \
- || !flag_pic ? INVALID_REGNUM \
- : reload_completed ? REGNO (pic_offset_table_rtx) \
+#define PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM \
+ ((TARGET_64BIT && (ix86_cmodel == CM_SMALL_PIC \
+ || TARGET_PECOFF)) \
+ || !flag_pic ? INVALID_REGNUM \
+ : pic_offset_table_rtx ? INVALID_REGNUM \
: REAL_PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM)
No negative conditions, please. Also, please follow established
multi-level condition format, please see e.g. HARD_REGNO_NREGS
definition in i386.h.
OK for mainline after infrastructure patch is approved.
Thanks,
Uros.
