rohitarulraj wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Maciej W. Rozycki [mailto:ma...@codesourcery.com] > > To: Ulrich Weigand > > Cc: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502; Wienskoski Edmar-RA8797; David Edelsohn; gcc- > > patc...@gcc.gnu.org; Alan Modra; Jakub Jelinek > > Subject: Re: [RFC: Patch, PR 60102] [4.9/4.10 Regression] powerpc fp-bit > > ices@dwf_regno > [snip] > > > > > > Rohit, could you verify whether this fixes the SPE problem? > >=20 > > Thanks for your work, I have applied your change to my 4.9 setup, rebuil= > t the > > compiler and smoke-tested it with gdb.base/store.exp and my e500v2 multil= > ib > > only; powerpc-linux-gnu target. Unfortunately your patch hasn't changed > > anything, the same failures remain. > >=20 > > Just to be sure I haven't missed anything I reverted your change and Roh= > it's > > one as well, rebuilt the compiler and rerun this testing and this time al= > l failures > > were gone. So it looks like your fix didn't completely cover the damage = > Rohit's > > change caused. :( > > Ulrich/Maciej, > > The patch works for me. > Tested with GCC v4.9 branch rev 216036 and GCC trunk rev 216027.
Thanks for testing! Can you work with Maciej to find out why he's seeing different results? Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain ulrich.weig...@de.ibm.com
