On 03 Oct 00:05, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> 2014-10-02 22:30 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com>:
> > On 10/02/14 08:30, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This patch adds a check for call destination register for a call return
> >> value optimization based on REG_RETURNED note.  This solves some ICE issues
> >> for MPX codes.
> >>
> >> Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.  OK for trunk?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Ilya
> >> --
> >> 2014-10-02  Ilya Enkovich  <ilya.enkov...@intel.com>
> >>
> >>         * lra-constraints.c (inherit_in_ebb): Handle calls with
> >>         multiple return values.
> >>         * caller-save.c (save_call_clobbered_regs): Likewise.
> >
> > This is fine.  Please put a comment before the new if (REG_P (...)))
> > conditional which notes that a CALL_INSN may have multiple return values
> > expressed in an EXPR_LIST.  That way if someone looks at this code a few
> > years down the line, they'll know exactly why the code checks REG_P rather
> > than just using the result blindly.
> >
> > Did this fix all the multiple-return issues you encountered?
> 
> With this fix almost all benchmarks compile successfully but there is
> still one ICE in LRA.  I described it in MPX ABI thread.
> 
> Ilya
> 
> >
> > Jeff
> >

Here is a vestion to be committed.

Ilya
--
2014-10-02  Ilya Enkovich  <ilya.enkov...@intel.com>

        * lra-constraints.c (inherit_in_ebb): Handle calls with
        multiple return values.
        * caller-save.c (save_call_clobbered_regs): Likewise.


diff --git a/gcc/caller-save.c b/gcc/caller-save.c
index 11df2ec..e28facb 100644
--- a/gcc/caller-save.c
+++ b/gcc/caller-save.c
@@ -879,8 +879,13 @@ save_call_clobbered_regs (void)
                  if (GET_CODE (pat) == PARALLEL)
                    pat = XVECEXP (pat, 0, 0);
                  dest = SET_DEST (pat);
-                 newpat = gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, cheap, copy_rtx (dest));
-                 chain = insert_one_insn (chain, 0, -1, newpat);
+                 /* For multiple return values dest is PARALLEL.
+                    Currently we handle only single return value case.  */
+                 if (REG_P (dest))
+                   {
+                     newpat = gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, cheap, copy_rtx (dest));
+                     chain = insert_one_insn (chain, 0, -1, newpat);
+                   }
                }
            }
           last = chain;
diff --git a/gcc/lra-constraints.c b/gcc/lra-constraints.c
index 5f68399..f1642f3 100644
--- a/gcc/lra-constraints.c
+++ b/gcc/lra-constraints.c
@@ -5348,16 +5348,21 @@ inherit_in_ebb (rtx_insn *head, rtx_insn *tail)
                  if (GET_CODE (pat) == PARALLEL)
                    pat = XVECEXP (pat, 0, 0);
                  dest = SET_DEST (pat);
-                 start_sequence ();
-                 emit_move_insn (cheap, copy_rtx (dest));
-                 restore = get_insns ();
-                 end_sequence ();
-                 lra_process_new_insns (curr_insn, NULL, restore,
-                                        "Inserting call parameter restore");
-                 /* We don't need to save/restore of the pseudo from
-                    this call.  */
-                 usage_insns[regno].calls_num = calls_num;
-                 bitmap_set_bit (&check_only_regs, regno);
+                 /* For multiple return values dest is PARALLEL.
+                    Currently we handle only single return value case.  */
+                 if (REG_P (dest))
+                   {
+                     start_sequence ();
+                     emit_move_insn (cheap, copy_rtx (dest));
+                     restore = get_insns ();
+                     end_sequence ();
+                     lra_process_new_insns (curr_insn, NULL, restore,
+                                            "Inserting call parameter 
restore");
+                     /* We don't need to save/restore of the pseudo from
+                        this call.      */
+                     usage_insns[regno].calls_num = calls_num;
+                     bitmap_set_bit (&check_only_regs, regno);
+                   }
                }
            }
          to_inherit_num = 0;

Reply via email to