On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 06:46:19PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> writes: > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:54:57AM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote: > >> Is this suppose to be resolved now? I'm still seeing some issues with a > >> branch cut from mainline from yesterday. > > > > Confirmed. The following patch works for me, and Andrew has tested it > > as well. The comment it removes isn't valid before the patch either. > > I get the impression from a short dismissal like that that this script > is pretty hated :-(.
I meant that it isn't valid currently; it was valid before the parallelisation patches. It would be nice if we could reconstruct the original order somehow. Without this patch the order is different every run though, and that makes comparing testresults unworkable. Segher
