On Oct 1, 2014, at 1:50 AM, Richard Earnshaw <rearn...@arm.com> wrote: > Isn't that exactly what I suggested? > > "However, since > GCC is supposed to bootstrap using a portable ISO C++ compiler, there's > an argument for removing the ambiguity entirely by being explicit.”
I think one can read that and not understand that in the language standard, it is a requirement. While those that know C++ well, know that, for those that don’t, I think it helps to see why it is a requirement.
