FX wrote:
> Now, here's a tiny patch to silence the related warning in PR36534.
> I also remove the condition on gfc_current_form != FORM_FIXED, as diagnostics
> should be emitted based on language/pedantic options, not source form.
Looks good to me. However:
In the test case, could you also add a "PR fortran/36534" to the
as comment?
Additionally, I wonder whether instead of the name-based checking
+ && (sym->name[0] != '_' || sym->name[1] != '_'))
it wouldn't be cleaner to check
&& sym->attr.intrinsic
(If you change it to attr.intrinsic, you need to set
the attribute also in intrinsic.c's gfc_convert_type_warn.)
I know that using __... names it not really possible in Fortran (except as C
binding name), but - still - I think it is cleaner. But I am fine with
either version.
Tobias
