On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 17:09 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 09/24/2014 02:42 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > As my example shows even with older GCCs depending on whether a const > > type or volatile type was encountered first a const volatile type comes > > out either as a DIE chain const_type DIE -> volatile_type DIE -> type > > DIE, or the other way around, in different compile units. > > Sorry, I overlooked that you were talking about 4.8.3 in your earlier mail. > > The patch is OK.
Thanks. I did post to the DWARF mailinglist to ask for clarification of the issue of ordering of type qualifier modifiers vs type unit signatures: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.standards.dwarf/202 Cheers, Mark
