On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/11/14 13:01, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> >> Ping? > > Not forgotten. Still waiting to hear back from Bin on my recommendation > that we drop the bogus note on the floor and avoid combining pseudos with > multiple sets like that.
Sorry that I missed this message days ago. I am currently on load/store pair which has higher priority. I will re-visit this after load/store pair issue, only thing I need is to include test case from PR62151 thus I can keep track of it, just as Jeff commented. Thanks, bin
