On 09/22/14 08:17, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Michael, I really don't understand the need for this change in your original
patch. I don't know if this was a temporary testing change or what.
I'm pretty sure it was temporary testing, when I still was finding my way
through dwarf2out limitations/constraints.
Ah perfect!
I'm happy to report that with this and the last set of patches, both C
and C++ guality tests have <= regressions than mainline. Yay.
Super.
Again, thank you for your original patchset, which has immensely helped
me navigate my way around the black box which was/is dwarf2out.
Aldy
