This PR is about a case where an XOR+EQ sequence can legitimately be simplified. The problem was that the sequence was operating on vectors while the simplified version used a 0 CONST_INT (const0_rtx).
The code seems to have been like that for a long time but presumably the bug has been latent until now. I suppose normally we'd want earlier optimisations to catch this. Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK to install? Thanks, Richard gcc/ PR rtl-optimization/62208 * simplify-rtx.c (simplify_relational_operation_1): Use CONST0_RTX rather than const0_rtx in eq/ne-xor simplifications. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.target/i386/pr62208.c: New test. Index: gcc/simplify-rtx.c =================================================================== --- gcc/simplify-rtx.c 2014-09-06 11:05:20.859563557 +0100 +++ gcc/simplify-rtx.c 2014-09-06 11:05:20.935564244 +0100 @@ -4480,16 +4480,16 @@ simplify_relational_operation_1 (enum rt && op0code == XOR && rtx_equal_p (XEXP (op0, 0), op1) && !side_effects_p (XEXP (op0, 0))) - return simplify_gen_relational (code, mode, cmp_mode, - XEXP (op0, 1), const0_rtx); + return simplify_gen_relational (code, mode, cmp_mode, XEXP (op0, 1), + CONST0_RTX (mode)); /* Likewise (eq/ne (xor x y) y) simplifies to (eq/ne x 0). */ if ((code == EQ || code == NE) && op0code == XOR && rtx_equal_p (XEXP (op0, 1), op1) && !side_effects_p (XEXP (op0, 1))) - return simplify_gen_relational (code, mode, cmp_mode, - XEXP (op0, 0), const0_rtx); + return simplify_gen_relational (code, mode, cmp_mode, XEXP (op0, 0), + CONST0_RTX (mode)); /* (eq/ne (xor x C1) C2) simplifies to (eq/ne x (C1^C2)). */ if ((code == EQ || code == NE) Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr62208.c =================================================================== --- /dev/null 2014-09-03 21:33:59.721983712 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr62208.c 2014-09-06 11:09:18.220708443 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +/* { dg-options "-O3 -fwhole-program -march=x86-64" } */ + +int *a; +unsigned int b; + +void fn2 () +{ + int t[9]; + for (; b; b++) + *a ^= (~t[b] != t[b]); +} + +int fn1 () +{ + fn2 (); + return 0; +} + +int main () +{ + fn1 (); + return 0; +}