Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> BTW, Jeff's comment on pr39228.c makes me think that this test
>> can be moved into execute/ieee. Thought?
>
> I don’t see a down side, specially if we know that the test case is picky
> about ieee.
Thanks for suggestion. The patch below simply moves it into
execute/ieee. Tested on i686-linux and sh-linux.
Regards,
kaz
--
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr44683.c: Move to ...
* gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/pr44683.c: ... here.
diff -uprN ORIG/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/pr44683.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/pr44683.c
--- ORIG/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/pr44683.c
1970-01-01 09:00:00.000000000 +0900
+++ trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/pr44683.c 2014-09-05
18:02:46.000000000 +0900
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+int __attribute__((noinline,noclone))
+copysign_bug (double x)
+{
+ if (x != 0.0 && (x * 0.5 == x))
+ return 1;
+ if (__builtin_copysign(1.0, x) < 0.0)
+ return 2;
+ else
+ return 3;
+}
+int main(void)
+{
+ double x = -0.0;
+ if (copysign_bug (x) != 2)
+ __builtin_abort ();
+ return 0;
+}
+
diff -uprN ORIG/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr44683.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr44683.c
--- ORIG/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr44683.c 2014-09-05
18:02:46.000000000 +0900
+++ trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr44683.c 1970-01-01
09:00:00.000000000 +0900
@@ -1,18 +0,0 @@
-int __attribute__((noinline,noclone))
-copysign_bug (double x)
-{
- if (x != 0.0 && (x * 0.5 == x))
- return 1;
- if (__builtin_copysign(1.0, x) < 0.0)
- return 2;
- else
- return 3;
-}
-int main(void)
-{
- double x = -0.0;
- if (copysign_bug (x) != 2)
- __builtin_abort ();
- return 0;
-}
-
