On 8/28/14 6:58, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 08/28/2014 06:51 AM, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
>> But, what makes you think there is a bug here?
>> The comment in sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common.h says:
>> // name should have space for at least max_len+1 bytes.
>>
> 
> Oh, really, but for me, I still prefer to let max_len as all real buffer
> length which like common sense (especially for extern functions).
> 
> If this extern function is not real used, at present (but will be used
> next), for me, I still want to improve it (about max_len).

In the current gcc source code, it is not used, but I guess, it may be
used, next.

Theoretically, we can treate all extern functions as API, which need be
more careful about its declarations (include parameters definition), or
may borther many callers:

 - If caller has duty to be sure of '\0' terminated (e.g. strncpy),
   callee need not care about it. For our case, need remove
   "name[max_len] = 0;".

 - If callee has duty to be sure of '\0' terminated (snprintf, gets),
   caller need not care about it. For our case, need use "max_len - 1"
   instead of "max_len".

For me, the extern function is neccesary to be improved in time (before
it is used by others). Or as an API, it is hard to be changed again.


Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang

Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed

Reply via email to