Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Sebastian Pop <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sebastian Pop wrote: > >> Richard Biener wrote: > >> > I think it would be better to identify a set of features we rely on that > >> > are not present in earlier versions and make the test a link > >> > test unconditionally. > >> > > >> > Tobias, are there include files / types / functions we require > >> > that are not available in earlier versions? > >> > >> The version 0.12 of ISL has an include file isl/val.h that is not present > >> in > >> previous versions of ISL. > >> > >> There also was a patch from Mircea a few weeks ago that was missing the > >> configure bits to check that the isl version contained isl/val.h. > >> I will update both patches and submit for review. > > > > I see that Mircea's patch has been committed: > > > > commit c5ec3cc336c7d42d9ad2995395d430b99a9a34cc > > Author: mircea <mircea@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4> > > Date: Mon Aug 11 15:05:48 2014 +0000 > > > > Replacement of isl_int by isl_val > > > > git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@213816 > > 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 > > > > Attached a patch to check for isl/val.h instead of ISL's release number. > > > > Bootstrapping on x86-64. Ok to commit? > > Ok. I suppose the "checking for version 0.12 of ISL" is now slightly > misleading - maybe change it to "checking for compatible ISL"?
Committed r214683 with the suggested change.
