On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Tom Tromey <t...@tromey.com> wrote: > Siva> I misunderstood then. But, I still do not understand what you mean by > Siva> "single function". > > I re-read my original note, and I think I wasn't very clear. Sorry > about that. > > All I mean here is that I think it's better to have a single > registration function in the libstdc++ python code. This function can > do all the needed work.
My patch is still using a single function to register libstdc++ xmethods. Do you mean there should be a single function for pretty printers and xmethods together? Thanks, Siva Chandra
