On 26/08/14 10:28 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 08/24/2014 12:37 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
With revision 214400 we have the C++14 value of __cplusplus set to
the correct value of 201402L (from 201300L).
It occurs to me: instead of having to remember every time those
numbers, couldn't we predefine, for example:
__cplusplus_98
__cplusplus_11
__cplusplus_14
with the correct values of course?!?
That seems like a good idea, but I'm not convinced there's any benefit
in Ed's changes to do:
-#if __cplusplus > 201103L
+#if __cplusplus >= 201402L
It seems like unnecessary churn to me, but if someone was changing
every test to use a symbolic constant instead of an integer literal
then I suppose it does no harm to change "> C++11" to ">= C++14" at
the same time.
