On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:47:17AM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Hello world, > > the attached patch uses the vec<> templates instead of the > home-grown memory management. > > Did I get the style right? I was a bit confused because, with > the declarations used in the patch, using the vec_safe_truncate > function failed with a failure to find the right template. > I'm not an experienced C++ programmer, so I would appreciate a quick > look at what I did. > > Regression-tested. No test case because there is no new > OK for trunk? Any other comments? >
Does this fix a bug in gfortran? "If it is not broken, don't fix it". -- Steve
