On 22 August 2014 21:33, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> wrote: >> Incidentally, I don't understand >> >>> + pp_c_ws_string (pp, (func_type && !method_type >> >> vs >>> >>> + pp_c_ws_string (pp, (func_type || method_type >> >> >> Surely the same logic is appropriate for both const and noreturn, and they >> are represented the same way on both function_ and method_type. > > Ah, Ok, now I see, it's just that volatile member functions aren't *that* > common ;)
Are there actually cases where the qualifiers mean different things for function_type and method_type?
