On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 07:44 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 08/06/14 11:20, David Malcolm wrote: > > gcc/ > > * function.h (struct rtl_data): Strengthen field > > "x_parm_birth_insn" from rtx to rtx_insn *. > > * function.c (struct assign_parm_data_all): Strengthen fields > > "first_conversion_insn" and "last_conversion_insn" from rtx to > > rtx_insn *. > OK. I think at this point any patch which merely changes the type of > some variable or in a signature from rtx to rtx_insn (or any of the > concrete passes) is considered trivial enough to go forward without > explicit review. > > That applies to patches in this series, additions you may need to make > due to changes in the tree since you last rebased and further > strengthening you or anyone else may want to tackle.
Thanks. Committed to trunk as r214191.
