On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Marek Polacek wrote: > And now the version with two bugs mention elsewhere fixed as well. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk? > > 2014-08-12 Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> > > * doc/invoke.texi: Document -Wc99-c11-compat. > c-family/ > * c.opt (Wc99-c11-compat): New option. > c/ > * c-decl.c (diagnose_mismatched_decls): Unconditionally call > pedwarn_c99 instead of pedwarn. > (grokfield): Likewise. > (warn_defaults_to): New function. > (grokdeclarator): Call warn_defaults_to instead of pedwarn_c99. > Unconditionally call pedwarn_c99 instead of pedwarn. > (start_function): Call warn_defaults_to instead of pedwarn_c99. > (declspecs_add_scspec): Call pedwarn_c99 instead of pedwarn, don't > check flag_isoc11 before. > * c-errors.c (pedwarn_c99): Change the return type to bool. > Handle -Wc99-c11-compat. > * c-parser.c (disable_extension_diagnostics): Handle > warn_c99_c11_compat. > (restore_extension_diagnostics): Likewise. > (c_parser_static_assert_declaration_no_semi): Call pedwarn_c99 > instead of pedwarn, don't check flag_isoc11 before. > (c_parser_declspecs): Likewise. > (c_parser_alignas_specifier): Likewise. > (c_parser_alignof_expression): Likewise. > (c_parser_generic_selection): Likewise. > * c-tree.h (pedwarn_c99): Update declaration. > * c-typeck.c (c_finish_return): Call pedwarn or warning_at instead > of pedwarn_c99. > testsuite/ > * gcc.dg/Wc99-c11-compat-1.c: New test. > * gcc.dg/Wc99-c11-compat-2.c: New test. > * gcc.dg/Wc99-c11-compat-3.c: New test. > * gcc.dg/Wc99-c11-compat-4.c: New test. > * gcc.dg/Wc99-c11-compat-5.c: New test. > * gcc.dg/Wc99-c11-compat-6.c: New test. > * gcc.dg/Wc99-c11-compat-7.c: New test.
OK. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
