On 08/07/14 05:32, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 08/06/2014 07:23 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/function.h b/gcc/function.h
index 28a20f3..ba7597c 100644
--- a/gcc/function.h
+++ b/gcc/function.h
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ struct GTY(()) expr_status {
rtx x_apply_args_value;
/* List of labels that must never be deleted. */
- rtx x_forced_labels;
+ rtx_expr_list *x_forced_labels;
};
As I said at the Cauldron, this sort of thing seems like the wrong thing
to do - when eliminating our own ancient list implementations we should
just go to normal C++ such as list<rtx>, or maybe even just a vec in
this case and some others. This applies to both expr_list and insn_list
- in the end we really shouldn't have either rtx_expr_list or
rtx_insn_list.
I agree.
But at this point I'd rather see David's work go forward independently,
then we can go back and do replacement of our home grown list with a
standard container. I suspect there's many of these kind of projects
that could be undertaken throughout GCC's sources.
Jeff
