On August 12, 2014 8:15:34 AM CEST, Roman Gareev <gareevro...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Checking for this specific AST may cause failures with future >versions of >> isl that choose a different schedule. Could you write a regular >expression >> that checks that there is no if-condition contained in a for loop? I >think >> this best models the issue that was addressed in the original bug >report. > >I’ve implemented this in the attached patch. Is it fine for trunk?
LGTM. Thanks
