On 07/30/2014 05:33 PM, Braden Obrzut wrote:
On 07/30/2014 04:44 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Why not do this in cp_parser_id_expression?
I did mention this in the original mail, is this definitely the way it
should be done?
In the original mail you mentioned doing it in cp_parser_template_id; I
agree that we probably don't want to do it there because of the
complications you are seeing. I was thinking about doing it when we
normally resolve an id-expression that refers to a variable, once we
know we're looking at an expression and not a declarator-id. But I
think my suggestion of cp_parser_id_expression was wrong, and it would
be better in finish_id_expression.
Jason
