On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:42:51AM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote: > On 07/21/2014 12:55 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote: > >I'm not really sure which is the better UI, > >but I'd rather time be spent > >on better automatic change log generation. > > Yeah. Do you have some particular complaints btw?
I haven't actually used it in a while, but istr there's an issue where if you change the prototype of a function mklog makes an entry for the previous function. Automatically inserting likewise where it would be appropriate would be nice, but fairly hard I suspect. > >I may or may not hope we'll > >eventually have a mklog that can autogenerate most ChangeLogs and then > >people will have a hard time arguing they're useful. > > I wonder how many GCC developers actually use the script (our team does). Not sure. I actually haven't used it ina while because I've mostly been generating patches where it was easier to do one entry for a ton of files so it was easier to generate that with git diff and sed. Trev > > -Y
