On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:21:16PM +0400, Yuri Gribov wrote: > Sounds like a bug, most likely in the lim pass. If it for some reason > decides to load from possibly uninitialized memory before the loop, it > better should make sure TREE_NO_WARNING is set. Can you please > file a PR for this, with preprocessed asan.c and minimal gcc options to > reproduce it?
Sure, I'll also check if I can submit a patch for this. > As for the workaround, my strong preference would be to do something like > following incrmeental patch instead, just use different gsi in the two > loops. Yeah, I also used this as a WAR originally. -Y
