> On 07/15/2014 11:29 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > >Yep, you are right. I was looking into this, too. I think dump_ada_template > >should be moved into C++ FE somehow because it deals with C++ trees. > >What would be most appropriate way to do so? > > I suppose we could pass a pointer to it into dump_ada_specs like we > do for cpp_check.
That sounds good. I will prepare patch and then prepare updated version of the RESULT_DECL patch - I reused DECL_ATTIBUTES of INSTANCE_METHOD and CLASS_METHOD. It seems to mostly work except for -Wuninitialized where we access these by accident. It is not hard to avoid this, but I think it may be better to turn those into custom decl structures - I plan to get rid of the ATTIBUTES pointer incrementally too by on-side hash that allows faster attribute lookups. I also plan to move DECL_SIZE/DECL_SIZE_UNIT into separate datastructure as discussed with Richard on IRC yesterday. Basically we can have size descriptors containing size, size unit and mode that are off-tree with pointers from both types and decls. This way we will avoid duplicating this info all the time. I sadly do not know how to turn Obj-C tree nodes into custom layout because there are no prior cases in Obj-C FE and there is obj-c++/c/objc/c++ code sharing that makes this a bit twisty. Any help would be welcome. Honza > > Jason
