> I'm seeing ICEs: »tree check: expected function_decl, have type_decl in
> fold_checksum_tree, at fold-const.c:14861«.  Is the following the correct
> fix, or should this be done differently?

No, it seems fine to me.  I added it to my local patch, thanks!
Honza
> 
> --- gcc/fold-const.c
> +++ gcc/fold-const.c
> @@ -14858,7 +14858,8 @@ fold_checksum_tree (const_tree expr, struct md5_ctx 
> *ctx,
>  
>        if (CODE_CONTAINS_STRUCT (TREE_CODE (expr), TS_DECL_NON_COMMON))
>       {
> -       fold_checksum_tree (DECL_VINDEX (expr), ctx, ht);
> +       if (TREE_CODE (expr) == FUNCTION_DECL)
> +         fold_checksum_tree (DECL_VINDEX (expr), ctx, ht);
>         fold_checksum_tree (DECL_RESULT_FLD (expr), ctx, ht);
>         fold_checksum_tree (DECL_ARGUMENT_FLD (expr), ctx, ht);
>       }
> 
> 
> Grüße,
>  Thomas


Reply via email to