> Except gcc now knows the size of partial int modes. In this case, > PSImode is 20 bits and TYPE_SIZE is 20 bits, so they match.
I don't understand. The problematic change is > - TYPE_SIZE (type) = bitsize_int (GET_MODE_BITSIZE (TYPE_MODE (type))); > + TYPE_SIZE (type) = bitsize_int (GET_MODE_PRECISION (TYPE_MODE > (type))); TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (type) = size_int (GET_MODE_SIZE (TYPE_MODE > (type))); break; which means that the precision of the mode is used to set the size of the type, which very likely means that the size of the mode is larger. So the size of the mode will be larger than the size of the type, which is a lie. > The code was biting me when TYPE_SIZE was bigger than PSImode, and the > code kept choosing SImode instead. IMO you're papering over the real issue, which appears to be the choice of the mode. Why does the code choose PSImode instead of SImode, if the type and the mode have the same precision (20) and size (24)? -- Eric Botcazou
