On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 12:23 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Mark Wielaard <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > The java frontend is one of the only places where build_type_variant is > > still used. New code should use build_qualified_type. See gcc/tree.h. > > > > Build and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. > > Ok.
Thanks. Pushed. > Can build_type_variant be removed now? Not yet. There are still a few usages that are easy to change to build_qualified_type like the ones in the java frontend. But there are 3 cases that I haven't figured out yet. c-common, ada and lto all use it in their implementation of handle_noreturn_attribute and c-common and lto in handle_const_attribute. I think the c-common one is correct, but maybe there is a reason for them to be slightly different. Cheers, Mark
