unify_one_argument was assuming that there's no way we can get a
type/value mismatch in a nested deduction, but it can happen with
variadic templates; deduction should just fail in that case.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit 40c2934a737ba5d2e406e079a2b249245dfb17ab
Author: Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Jun 30 10:41:22 2014 -0400
PR c++/61539
* pt.c (unify_one_argument): Type/expression mismatch just causes
deduction failure.
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
index f0a598b..7f33b6d 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -16501,8 +16501,9 @@ unify_one_argument (tree tparms, tree targs, tree parm, tree arg,
maybe_adjust_types_for_deduction (strict, &parm, &arg, arg_expr);
}
else
- gcc_assert ((TYPE_P (parm) || TREE_CODE (parm) == TEMPLATE_DECL)
- == (TYPE_P (arg) || TREE_CODE (arg) == TEMPLATE_DECL));
+ if ((TYPE_P (parm) || TREE_CODE (parm) == TEMPLATE_DECL)
+ != (TYPE_P (arg) || TREE_CODE (arg) == TEMPLATE_DECL))
+ return unify_template_argument_mismatch (explain_p, parm, arg);
/* For deduction from an init-list we need the actual list. */
if (arg_expr && BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (arg_expr))
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic160.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic160.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..20fcd5b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic160.C
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+// PR c++/61539
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template <typename _CharT> class A;
+template <typename> class B;
+template <class charT> class C;
+template <> class C<char>
+{
+ virtual void xparse (int &, const B<A<char> > &) const;
+};
+template <class T, class charT = char> class G : C<charT>
+{
+public:
+ G (void *) {}
+ void default_value (const T &);
+ void xparse (int &, const B<A<charT> > &) const;
+};
+template <class T, class charT>
+void validate (int &, const B<A<charT> > &, T *, int);
+template <class T, class charT>
+void G<T, charT>::xparse (int &p1, const B<A<charT> > &p2) const
+{
+ validate (p1, p2, (T *)0, 0);
+}
+template <class T> G<T> *value (T *) { return new G<T>(0); }
+namespace Eigen
+{
+template <typename T> struct D;
+template <typename, int, int, int = 0, int = 0, int = 0 > class F;
+template <typename _Scalar, int _Rows, int _Cols, int _Options, int _MaxRows,
+ int _MaxCols>
+struct D<F<_Scalar, _Rows, _Cols, _Options, _MaxRows, _MaxCols> >
+{
+ typedef _Scalar Scalar;
+};
+template <typename, int, int, int, int, int _MaxCols> class F
+{
+public:
+ typedef typename Eigen::D<F>::Scalar Scalar;
+ F (const Scalar &, const Scalar &, const Scalar &);
+};
+template <class... T>
+void validate (int &, const B<A<char> > &, Eigen::F<T...> *);
+}
+int main (int, char *[])
+{
+ Eigen::F<double, 3, 1> a (0, 0, 0);
+ value (&a)->default_value (Eigen::F<double, 3, 1>(0, 0, 0));
+}