Hi,
this remained unresolved for a long time, but, if I understand correctly
Jason' Comment 1, should be rather easy, just do not complain for
uninitialized const members in aggregates, recursively too (per struct B
in the testcases). Does the below makes sense, then?!? It passes
testing, anyway. I'm also taking the occasion to guard the warnings with
complain & tf_warning.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/////////////////////
Index: cp/typeck2.c
===================================================================
--- cp/typeck2.c (revision 211955)
+++ cp/typeck2.c (working copy)
@@ -1342,28 +1342,15 @@ process_init_constructor_record (tree type, tree i
next = massage_init_elt (TREE_TYPE (field), next, complain);
/* Warn when some struct elements are implicitly initialized. */
- warning (OPT_Wmissing_field_initializers,
- "missing initializer for member %qD", field);
+ if (complain & tf_warning)
+ warning (OPT_Wmissing_field_initializers,
+ "missing initializer for member %qD", field);
}
else
{
- if (TREE_READONLY (field))
+ if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (field)) == REFERENCE_TYPE)
{
if (complain & tf_error)
- error ("uninitialized const member %qD", field);
- else
- return PICFLAG_ERRONEOUS;
- }
- else if (CLASSTYPE_READONLY_FIELDS_NEED_INIT (TREE_TYPE (field)))
- {
- if (complain & tf_error)
- error ("member %qD with uninitialized const fields", field);
- else
- return PICFLAG_ERRONEOUS;
- }
- else if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (field)) == REFERENCE_TYPE)
- {
- if (complain & tf_error)
error ("member %qD is uninitialized reference", field);
else
return PICFLAG_ERRONEOUS;
@@ -1371,8 +1358,9 @@ process_init_constructor_record (tree type, tree i
/* Warn when some struct elements are implicitly initialized
to zero. */
- warning (OPT_Wmissing_field_initializers,
- "missing initializer for member %qD", field);
+ if (complain & tf_warning)
+ warning (OPT_Wmissing_field_initializers,
+ "missing initializer for member %qD", field);
if (!zero_init_p (TREE_TYPE (field)))
next = build_zero_init (TREE_TYPE (field), /*nelts=*/NULL_TREE,
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/aggr1.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/aggr1.C (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/aggr1.C (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// PR c++/49132
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct A {
+ const int m;
+};
+
+A a1 = {};
+A a2{};
+
+struct B {
+ A a;
+};
+
+B b1 = {};
+B b2{};
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/init/aggr11.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/init/aggr11.C (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/init/aggr11.C (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// PR c++/49132
+
+struct A {
+ const int m;
+};
+
+A a1 = {};
+
+struct B {
+ A a;
+};
+
+B b1 = {};