On 06/20/2014 02:59 PM, Kai Tietz wrote: > So I suggest following change of passes.def: > > Index: passes.def > =================================================================== > --- passes.def (Revision 211850) > +++ passes.def (Arbeitskopie) > @@ -384,7 +384,6 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see > NEXT_PASS (pass_rtl_dse2); > NEXT_PASS (pass_stack_adjustments); > NEXT_PASS (pass_jump2); > - NEXT_PASS (pass_peephole2); > NEXT_PASS (pass_if_after_reload); > NEXT_PASS (pass_regrename); > NEXT_PASS (pass_cprop_hardreg); > @@ -391,6 +390,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see > NEXT_PASS (pass_fast_rtl_dce); > NEXT_PASS (pass_duplicate_computed_gotos); > NEXT_PASS (pass_reorder_blocks); > + NEXT_PASS (pass_peephole2); > NEXT_PASS (pass_branch_target_load_optimize2); > NEXT_PASS (pass_leaf_regs); > NEXT_PASS (pass_split_before_sched2);
Looks good to me. I guess just keep an eye out for bug reports for other ports. r~
