> From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 5:05 PM > > Backports are welcome - please post a patch. >
Sorry for the delay. Here you are: diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr61375.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr61375.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d3b54a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr61375.c @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +#ifdef __UINT64_TYPE__ +typedef __UINT64_TYPE__ uint64_t; +#else +typedef unsigned long long uint64_t; +#endif + +#ifndef __SIZEOF_INT128__ +#define __int128 long long +#endif + +/* Some version of bswap optimization would ICE when analyzing a mask constant + too big for an HOST_WIDE_INT (PR61375). */ + +__attribute__ ((noinline, noclone)) uint64_t +uint128_central_bitsi_ior (unsigned __int128 in1, uint64_t in2) +{ + __int128 mask = (__int128)0xffff << 56; + return ((in1 & mask) >> 56) | in2; +} + +int +main (int argc) +{ + __int128 in = 1; +#ifdef __SIZEOF_INT128__ + in <<= 64; +#endif + if (sizeof (uint64_t) * __CHAR_BIT__ != 64) + return 0; + if (sizeof (unsigned __int128) * __CHAR_BIT__ != 128) + return 0; + if (uint128_central_bitsi_ior (in, 2) != 0x102) + __builtin_abort (); + return 0; +} diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.c index 9ff857c..9d64205 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.c +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.c @@ -1741,6 +1741,8 @@ find_bswap_1 (gimple stmt, struct symbolic_number *n, int limit) if (n->size % BITS_PER_UNIT != 0) return NULL_TREE; n->size /= BITS_PER_UNIT; + if (n->size > (int)sizeof (unsigned HOST_WIDEST_INT)) + return NULL_TREE; n->n = (sizeof (HOST_WIDEST_INT) < 8 ? 0 : (unsigned HOST_WIDEST_INT)0x08070605 << 32 | 0x04030201); @@ -1781,6 +1783,8 @@ find_bswap_1 (gimple stmt, struct symbolic_number *n, int limit) type_size = TYPE_PRECISION (gimple_expr_type (stmt)); if (type_size % BITS_PER_UNIT != 0) return NULL_TREE; + if (type_size > (int)HOST_BITS_PER_WIDEST_INT) + return NULL_TREE; if (type_size / BITS_PER_UNIT < (int)(sizeof (HOST_WIDEST_INT))) { Ok for GCC 4.8 and GCC 4.9 branches? Best regards, Thomas