> > * cris, m68k, pdp11, and vax actually use "g". > > > > So it won't be all that much work to completely get rid of "g". > > Do we want that? > > Is it simply a matter of replacing “g” by “mri”? That’s what the doc > suggests. Or is there more to the story than that?
As far as I know "g" and "rmi" are equivalent, yes. "g" is easier to type and read if you use it a lot (only ancient targets really); the compiler will probably become somewhat slower for those targets, and perhaps somewhat faster for all others. Hard to say without doing the work and measuring the result :-) Segher
